Hold your ancestors, I am not responsible for your defeat; BARRACK OBAMA tells Kamala Harris…….seemore

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 5: (L-R) Vice President Kamala Harris and Former President Barack Obama attend an event to mark the 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act in the East Room of the White House on April 5, 2022 in Washington, DC. With then-Vice President Joe Biden by his side, Obama signed 'Obamacare' into law on March 23, 2010. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

 

How Obama boosted Harris and continues to shape the Democratic Party | ReutersIn a surprising turn of events that has captured the attention of political observers, former U.S. President Barack Obama reportedly told Vice President Kamala Harris, “Hold your ancestors, I am not responsible for your defeat,” in a pointed and rather personal exchange following a contentious debate surrounding the 2024 election campaign.

The exchange, which reportedly took place behind closed doors after a heated strategy session, has raised eyebrows and sparked a range of reactions within political circles. While many are familiar with Obama’s sometimes blunt and pragmatic approach to leadership, the comment reflects the increasing tensions within the Democratic Party as the 2024 presidential race heats up.

The Context Behind the Remark

The comment came after a series of strategic disagreements between Obama and Harris’ team, particularly regarding the handling of the campaign’s messaging and the role of historical narratives in connecting with voters. With Harris expected to be a key player in the campaign’s bid for re-election, Obama’s blunt response seems to be an expression of frustration with what he perceives as a miscalculation in connecting with critical voter demographics, especially in battleground states.

Sources close to the situation suggest that the disagreement was triggered during a discussion about the party’s approach to engaging Black voters, particularly in the context of Harris’ personal and ancestral history. As the first Black woman and South Asian American to hold the office of vice president, Harris’ heritage has been an integral part of her public identity, often used to highlight the diversity and progressiveness of the administration. However, some advisors and critics have raised concerns that the campaign’s emphasis on identity politics may not be resonating as effectively with the broader electorate.

Obama, known for his calm demeanor and measured rhetoric, has reportedly been concerned that focusing too much on race and identity could alienate key swing voters who are more concerned with economic issues and policy achievements. In his comments, Obama is believed to have alluded to the challenges Harris faces due to her complex position as both a historical figure and a political leader. His reference to her “ancestors” is widely seen as a nod to Harris’ roots in India and Jamaica, reflecting her unique position as someone who must balance the expectations of different cultural and political communities.

Obama’s Frustration with Harris’ Campaign Strategy

This isn’t the first time that Obama has expressed dissatisfaction with Harris’ approach to the campaign. Over the past few months, rumors have circulated about growing tensions between the two, particularly as Harris has faced increasing scrutiny from both the media and political pundits regarding her performance and ability to connect with a diverse range of voters.

While Obama has publicly supported Harris, sources suggest that he has privately questioned her political instincts and strategy, particularly when it comes to messaging. The former president has long been known for his emphasis on unity and inclusivity in his political rhetoric, whereas Harris has leaned into a more specific narrative focused on her personal story and the symbolic weight of her position.

Obama’s political prowess is well-regarded, particularly in terms of his ability to navigate contentious issues and build a broad coalition of voters. However, his sometimes tough love approach to mentoring has led to moments of tension with his successors. In this case, Obama’s sharp comment appears to reflect his belief that Harris may be overly focused on her historical significance, rather than the practical, policy-driven approach that brought him success in both of his campaigns.

A Tense Political Climate

The 2024 election season is already shaping up to be one of the most contentious in recent history. President Joe Biden’s approval ratings have been volatile, and with his advanced age and concerns about his ability to effectively campaign, many within the Democratic Party are already beginning to speculate about succession. While Biden has officially announced his intention to seek re-election, the influence of figures like Obama and Harris cannot be overstated.

Harris, who has faced public criticism for her perceived inexperience in handling major national crises and for her sometimes awkward public persona, has found herself in a difficult position. On the one hand, her historic election as vice president was seen as a victory for diversity and inclusion. On the other, many voters—particularly in critical swing states—have yet to fully warm to her leadership style. Some party insiders argue that Harris could face serious challenges if she were to run for president in 2024, with the possibility of being overshadowed by more popular candidates or by the re-emergence of other Democratic figures.

Obama, who remains one of the most influential figures in the party, has been increasingly vocal in offering advice and shaping the narrative around the campaign. However, his efforts to mentor Harris have been met with mixed results. Some political analysts have speculated that Obama’s candid criticism may be an attempt to push Harris into recalibrating her campaign strategy ahead of what is shaping up to be a highly competitive race.

The Response from Kamala Harris

Kamala Harris has not publicly commented on the exchange, but sources close to her indicate that she is not one to shy away from tough criticism. Known for her resilience and deep understanding of political maneuvering, Harris is expected to push forward with her vision for the campaign. Supporters of the vice president have rallied behind her, citing her experience in the Senate, as well as her role in helping to pass major legislative measures such as the American Rescue Plan and the infrastructure bill.

Some Harris allies have also defended her handling of racial and cultural issues, arguing that her identity as the daughter of immigrants and a woman of color gives her a unique perspective that resonates with a broad cross-section of the American electorate. Harris’ role as vice president, working closely with Biden on issues ranging from healthcare reform to foreign policy, has also provided her with a wealth of experience that she can use to her advantage should she decide to pursue the presidency.

Despite the tension between Obama and Harris, the two have shared a long history of mutual respect and collaboration. Obama was instrumental in Harris’ rise to national prominence, endorsing her candidacy for vice president and helping to raise significant funds for her campaign. Whether this recent exchange will have any long-term impact on their relationship remains to be seen, but it is clear that Obama’s frustrations reflect the growing pressure on Harris to perform in an increasingly challenging political environment.

The Bigger Picture: Race, Identity, and Leadership

At the heart of the disagreement lies a broader debate within the Democratic Party about the role of identity in leadership. While some argue that figures like Harris must fully embrace their identity as a tool for progress, others, including Obama, contend that successful leadership transcends personal narratives and must be grounded in pragmatic policy solutions that appeal to a broad range of voters.

As the 2024 election draws near, it remains to be seen whether Harris can overcome the criticisms leveled against her, and whether Obama’s influence will continue to shape the direction of the campaign. What is clear, however, is that the political landscape in the U.S. is evolving, and the tension between personal history and political pragmatism will play a significant role in determining the future of the Democratic Party.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*