Headline:WNBA Reporter Criticized for Giving Angel Reese Fourth-Place MVP Vote

Reporter Criticized for Fourth-Place MVP Vote for Angel Reese

A WNBA reporter is facing widespread criticism for awarding a fourth-place MVP vote to Chicago Sky rookie Angel Reese, sparking controversy over the MVP voting process. On Sunday, Las Vegas Aces star A’ja Wilson was named a unanimous MVP for the second time in WNBA history, a decision that was well-received by most. However, the vote for Reese left many media members and fans puzzled.

The MVP ballot, cast by 67 anonymous media members, ranks five players, with points assigned based on placement. While Wilson and Minnesota Lynx forward Napheesa Collier dominated the top two spots, and New York Liberty star Breanna Stewart earned a lone second-place vote, the fourth-place vote for Reese raised eyebrows.

Reese had an impressive rookie season, averaging 13.6 points and a league-leading 13.1 rebounds per game, but her 39.1% field goal percentage and missing the final six games due to a wrist injury were seen as major drawbacks. Additionally, her team, the Chicago Sky, ended the season with a disappointing 13-27 record, the third-worst in the league. Many argued that players like Sabrina Ionescu, Nneka Ogwumike, or Alyssa Thomas were far more deserving of that fourth-place vote.

Several media members took to social media to express their disbelief. James Boyd of The Athletic wrote, “Whoever used a fourth-place MVP vote on Reese should be banned from voting on league awards forever. They clearly don’t take the process seriously and can’t even pretend to be unbiased.” Sports Illustrated’s Robin Lundberg added, “Voting Angel Reese 4th for MVP is neglecting professional responsibility,” while David Eickholt of 247 Sports echoed, “Having Angel Reese anywhere near the top-20 MVP voting should be grounds to have your vote taken away.”

While Reese had a standout rookie season, especially as a dominant rebounder, many believe she still needs more growth before she truly enters MVP conversations. The incident has reignited discussions about the transparency and fairness of the WNBA’s award voting process.